The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were
unemployed, employed, or in further education in 1980, 1990, and 2000.
The pie charts compare how many percentages students are out of work, career or
continued study after passing secondary school between 1980,1990 and 2000.
In general, What stands out from the graph is that while the figure for students
choosing further education and did not work witnessed fluctuations, there was progress
gradual in the proportion of employed over the period shown.
Looking at the graph for more details, starting at 50%, the percentage of students in
secondary school who decided to continue their studies took first place in 1980, going
down to 28% in the next 10 years, then keep up its a downward trend by 1% during the
last year. In the case of the unemployed, the figure contributed to 10% at the beginning
time before pursuing to rise to 12% in 1990, however, that figure declined instead of
rising to 8% at the end of the period.
On the other hand, Employed was only a feature which had an upward trend. From the
beginning, the proportion of people who have a career made up 40% then started to
increase moderately to 55% in the next 20 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-27 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or in further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 78
- Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 78
- The graph shows the average Japanese month salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white televisions and color televisions during the same period 78
- The following pie chart shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two different years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 48, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... 28% in the next 10 years, then keep up its a downward trend by 1% during the last...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, second, then, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82010582011 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49902419298 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.4799710504 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.833333333 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8333333333 5.23603664747 245% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 14.0 3.83414634146 365% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202183376518 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888901601211 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590655475295 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596021630467 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737668640174 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.