Many people today would argue that cinemas are becoming irrelevant due to new streaming services. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an argument that because of the development of online streaming services, movie theaters are becoming anachronistic. From my perspective, I partly agree with this statement.
For a variety of reasons, it would be inappropriate to alter movie theaters with online media. First and foremost, watching movies at home cannot be as qualified as at the theater. This can be explained by the fact that cinemas provide clients with high-quality big screens, modern sound systems, and comfortable seats while technical devices can not be as modern as them. Secondly, these over-the-top platforms are unable to give us films that have just been released from the production brand. It is unchallenged for people to find these movies on illegal websites, although these types of websites provide low-quality films and an excessive load of advertisements.
On the other hand, the idea of choosing online media is beneficial for some reasons. From an economic and time perspective, not going to theaters would be better. This is because people have to spend an amount of time traveling to theaters whenever they want to watch movies. Also, tickets at these places cost more than many applications releasing films on personal devices. This is perfectly exemplified by large resources such as Netflix and Prime. By using these apps, people can easily keep far away from wasting money. In addition, online streaming services are more likely to satisfy their customers. While movie theaters are becoming obsolete by the fact that they just released a limited range of films, the Internet is a place where people can find any film they want.
In conclusion, despite the large number of advantages theaters bring, I believe that Internet platforms are more appropriate for people in this modern era.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | Aditya Ajai | 26 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | Htrangn | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-10 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
- Many people today would argue that cinemas are becoming irrelevant due to new streaming services To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 73
- Young people who commit crimes should be treated the same as adults by the authorities To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 78
- Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
- Today s fresh food like vegetables or fruits travels thousands of miles from the rural areas or farms before it reaches customers in cities or urban areas Why is this Is this a positive or negative trend 89
Comments
The ongoing debate between…
The ongoing debate between traditional movie theaters and online streaming services like APNE TV highlights how technology is reshaping entertainment consumption. While movie theaters offer a premium experience with big screens, surround sound, and the latest releases, online platforms provide convenience, affordability, and a vast library of content, especially for those who enjoy Indian dramas, movies, and shows. With services like APNE TV, viewers can access a wide range of regional content at their fingertips, eliminating the need for travel and high-ticket costs. Ultimately, online streaming caters to the growing demand for accessible, on-demand entertainment, making it a popular choice for many.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2214532872 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78195097122 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574394463668 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8510900102 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3125 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0913563775848 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320425696936 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248810698039 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0606007434672 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289971198977 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.