Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are both about the consequences of team work. The author of the reading states that work can be accomplished efficiently when done in group. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions involvement of people create distinct opinion which results distraction in work and attacks each of the claim made in the article.
Firsly, the author begins by stating that team work offers varities of ideas and plans which allows team to response quickly to assigned task. The lecturer believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends that since there are different point of view of group members, it takes time to come to a mutual decision. In addition, if any one of the member reject the other plan, they have to do further discussion to come to a conclusion.
Secondly, according to the writing, wide range of skills and expertise in a group allow creative solution to the problem. In addition, not a single member but everyone is accountable for the productive output. The speaker on other hand points out that if thje proposed decison gone wrong, everyone in a group is blamed.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that team work is very rewarding. The collective voice of a group is impactful and far reaching which won’t be the case while done in alone. Additionally, this provides aid for individual to shine and recognized in a mass. The professor rebuts this agrument. He puts forth the idea that since everyone should take an account for good or bad deeds by a member, it is not possible for a person to excell individually.
To sum up, the author and the lecturer holds very conflicting views on benefits of team work. The speaker effectively c hallenges the points made in the article.
- Students who are given grades work harder than those who are not Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should keep trying to reach their goals even if they seem impossible to achieve Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- owadays computers are widely used in education As a result some people think teachers no longer play important roles in classrooms To what extend do you agree or disagree 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...plished efficiently when done in group. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions involve...
^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cison gone wrong, everyone in a group is blamed. Finally, the reading passage al...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86779661017 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67116493151 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572881355932 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1615320106 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7777777778 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156385213574 0.272083759551 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509816214889 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542334844992 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900798888254 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500667429087 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.