Some believe that nuclear weapons benefit the world at large. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is notion that world can gain tangible benefits of nuclear weapon which considers extensively worthwhile. I partially agree of this view which will be elaborated in the forthcoming paragraph.
To begin with, there has been a general public view towards nuclear as the most hazardous and inhumane weapons witnessed by how devastated the scale is. The conflict between Iraq and the party affiliation (the UK and the USA), for example, are most likely afflicted by the issue of Saddam Hussein’s possession of weapons of mass destruction. In addition, the radioactive exploded could both jeopardise natural environment and kill millions of people, not to mention the long-term health consequences. The fact that bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1954 has been adversely affecting ecological disruption, along with genetic damage.
Conversely, I would believe that there is a compelling benefit of nuclear fuel considered to be reliable source of energy. As the researchers ensure that the power is more environmentally safe and inexpensive cost, so that, replacing the conventional to sustainable ones could keep the world better in decades ahead. Furthermore, the weapons are more likely to contribute on national defense and security. This is because to maintain the global relationships among countries can bring about both the peaceful use of nuclear technologies and the foreseeable opportunities of its development.
In conclusion, the nuclear energy showing benefits to the world is likely to promote clean energy sources as well as to support national security and energy diplomacy. This is provided that there is strictly controlled limitation of using such power as a weapon to attack other countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
- Some people think technology development decreases crime while others believe it actually encourages crime Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- People now days send text massages more frequently than they talk the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Alternative energy sources that use the natural power of the wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- In many countries people now wear western clothes such as suits and jeans rather than traditional clothing Why is this the case Is this a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...angible benefits of nuclear weapon which considers extensively worthwhile. I part...
^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...aph. To begin with, there has been a general public view towards nuclear as the most hazard...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, furthermore, so, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47744360902 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06280251223 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616541353383 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9753001686 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.416666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176520739755 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591875988773 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517783027073 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107109732087 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395883075393 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.