The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emission per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1976 and 2007.
The line graph given demonstrate how much carbon dioxide emitted per each people in four different countries within a timespan of 40 years, commencing with 1967.
Overall, while the amount of carbon dioxide in the UK and Sweden released in a downward trend, meanwhile an upward trend was witnessed in the Italy and Portugal. Another key feature is that the emission of carbon dioxide in the UK always stayed at the highest figure, that reserved in the Portugal over period of 40 years.
In the UK, starting with nearly 11 tonnes of CO2 per person in 1967, this figure gradually decreased in later years before reaching at a low at about 9 tonnes in 2007. In Sweden, after an 1 tonne increase in first 10 years, the average amount of CO2 discharged by each person significant fell to 7 tonnes in 1987 before reaching at low under 6 tonnes in 2007.
Meanwhile, there was an inverse trend undergoing in Italy and Portugal. The average quantity of CO2 released per person increase from 4 tonnes in 1967 to about 7.5 tonnes in 1997 before staying static at the same level in ten years later in Italy. The number for that in Portugal was nearly 1 tonne in 1967 prior to going up greatly to over 5 tonnes in 1997 and remaining unchangeable hitherto 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-22 | nguyenthanhloc | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | nguyenthanhloc | 56 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 84
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of the surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 89
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 67
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 84
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60986547085 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44051678589 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547085201794 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.55569065 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222390197277 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979791783428 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288677550287 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132640655268 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222709910067 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.