The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year.
The two plans present the Southwest airport in its current stance and the renovated structure in one year time.
Overall, the area will greatly expand in space, so as in the amount of services it has to offer. Mirroring the departures zone, arrivals will obtain the café and even go a step further by adding such options as ATM and car parking.
Currently, the Southwest outpost consists of only two entranceways that separate departing passengers from those who have just arrived. Prior to entering the security passport control point, travelers are welcome to check-in at the counter or stop by the cafeteria. Both, embarking and disembarking waiting rooms are presently empty, same as the hall after the customs check. Connected by the walkway, eight ports are open for planes.
According to the proposal, only checks for documents and customs will stay the same. The most significant development will be the rising square footage allocated to plane portals, number of which will jump from eight to eighteen. Quickly carrying people from one place to another, sky train will replace the walking way. To further improve personal experience, the array of shops will be opened. Meeting visitors will be entitled to visit bistro or use cash machine; the latter can be especially useful for the car hire, which is also a part of the expanded building now. The interior of the abutting area on the left after the reshuffle will gain a backdrop stop. Lastly, extra pair of opening doors will help to deal with queues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-08 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-16 | ThHuong | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
- Summarise the points in the lecture and explain how they cast doubt on the point made in the reading 90
- The given graphs illustrate a waste ratio within the family of UK in 1985 and 2002 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past 80
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 80
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48256366006 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669291338583 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0713490295 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7142857143 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145011351214 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452566297608 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335140438979 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802762127535 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455753230681 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48256366006 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669291338583 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0713490295 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7142857143 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145011351214 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452566297608 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335140438979 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802762127535 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455753230681 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.