Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a hotly-debated issue over whether highschool students should be given freedom to evaluate or even be critical of the teaching of their educators, or these rights should be prohibited due to lack of regard and order. While I recognise that these kinds of judgements may provoke disrespect and disorganisation among them, I hold a firm belief that students’ assessment of their teachers should be prioritised, with a view to enhancing academic efficiency.
On the one hand, there is no denying the fact that this two-way communication may trigger some repercussions related to attitudes of learning and teaching. First and foremost, allowing children to make negative comments will culminate in negligence in their study. In all probability, it would prompt teenagers to assume that they are superior to their professors. This, coupled with the fact that they are likely to be inexperienced and not knowledgeable enough to make judgements, will end up in classes being such chaos. Another aftermath is that teachers will stand high chance of facing severe criticism from students. Specifically, students’ misuse of the prerogative to appraise their guides’ personal lives or appearances, just because they have low opinions about them, will result in lack of teachers’ power in class.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that students should be incentivised to assess teachers’ lessons. The first and perhaps the most persuasive reason is that this measure will make it possible for youngsters to make the most of the lectures at school. As a matter of fact, there is no teaching method suitable for all learners, given that they have different levels of understanding. Students, therefore, are held accountable for giving constructive feedbacks about the aspects of teaching they are unable to comprehend. In addition, it is even more urgent to complain about teachers’ failure to take charge of their class. Unequivocally, the onus is on them to deal with students’ low grades and conflicts at school, but without the responsibility to tackle these problems, teenagers will no longer concentrate on their study. Hence, it is vital to express criticism so that teachers can harmonise and raise the learning ambience.
In conclusion, while schools should have limitations to the extent in which students can make evaluations about teachers, it is my reaffirmation that their comments and criticism are of great significance, seeing that they will do wonders for the exellence of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-13 | MinhJoyluv | 87 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | thanh1927540 | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | thanh1927540 | 67 | view |
- Write a paragraph of about 180 220 words about the benefits and drawbacks of advertising 56
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 89
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 73
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who wants to study in universities To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- In some countries schools are open till late so that children can be looked after when parents are at work Discuss the advantages and disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32832080201 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08830308904 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6219607278 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.875 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9375 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211015321073 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070395572089 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429660912046 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134511107808 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160812430949 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.