Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they support or detract from the points made in the reading passage.
The reading and lecturer are both about the continuation of issues created by alchololist despite charging penalty. The author of the reading states the possible solution pertaining to these problems. The professor agrees however he arises the questions towards the stated alternatives made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that in oder to mitigate alcohol influence, traffic police can enforce the policy of breathe testing. Owing to this, they can easily identify the drunk level and enact punishment as per driving law. The professor believes these sound great merely on paper yet this does not guarantee there will be decrement in alcohol impact.
Secondly, according to the writing, standard procedure can be applied such as officer could conduct the test of suspicion by observing the tell tale sign unless they accepted them as guilty. The speaker on other hand points out that this does not seem to be fair for instance, a person might slurd either of their physical illness or they actually had consumed alcohol. In addition, they have to confer legal justification otherwise there will be elevating in police abuse over innocent one.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that random checking might work for real for retaining public safety. Additionally, there has been instance of profound imapct of plummeting in accidents stemmed from drunkers. The professor corroborates that indeed this has proved to be effective. Yet, he points out that is it really essential for such outcome?
As we can see, the professor is in favor of author to some extent yet he has some doubts regarding to his stated solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-28 | prakriti malla | 85 | view |
- Government should put tax on unhealthy food to promote better health Do you agree or disagree 76
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement Children should be required to help with household tasks as soon as they are able to do so 76
- Technological progress has made the world a better place Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Use specific details and examples to support your answer 86
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Several languages die each year Many people feel this is a positive trend and that a world with fewer languages promotes harmony and understanding between people Analyze both sides of this argument and provide your opinion 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... solution pertaining to these problems. The professor agrees however he arises the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...duct the test of suspicion by observing the tell tale sign unless they accepted them as ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, however, if, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17228464419 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58531705421 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651685393258 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2049644326 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6428571429 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119194291017 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367448527067 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288845003878 0.0662205650399 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.056736979997 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417588709627 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.