The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and Fairtrade-labelled bananas in five European countries between 1999 and 2004.
The tables compares five European nations in terms of sales of Fairtrade-labbelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004.
Overall, most five countries saw an overall increase in sales of both coffee, but sales of Fairtrade bananas only went up in three out of five countries from 1999 to 2004. It is clear that the spending of bananas in the UK was the highest, compared to other countries.
Looking at sales of coffee, Switzerland reached/had the highest sales of Fairtrade coffee, about 3 million euros in 1999, this figure doubled to 6 euros in 2004. Also, there were 1.8 and 1.5 million euros of turnover of coffee in Denmark the UK, these figures rose by 0.2 and 18.5 after the period of 5 years, respectively. Belgium and Sweden, which earned 1 million and 0.8 million euro, managed to maximize their profits to 1.7 and 1 million euro in 2004.
Nevertheless, the UK earn huge money from sales of bananas in both years, about 15 and 47 million of euros. In 1999, Switzerland and Denmark earn about 1 and 0.6 millions, these numbers went up to 5.5 and 4 million euros in the next 5 following years. By contrast, the figures of sales of bananas in Belgium and Sweden was under 2 million euros in 1999. 2004 saw a decline in these figures in these two countries, reaching to under 1 million euro.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-06 | chauthithuyvy | 81 | view |
- It is easier and more affordable for people to visit travel to other nations Is this positive negative development 73
- The tables compares five European nations in terms of sales of Fairtrade labbelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 Overall most five countries saw an overall increase in sales of both coffee but sales of Fairtrade bananas only went up in three out of 10
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and Fairtrade labelled bananas in five European countries between 1999 and 2004 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'compare'.
Suggestion: compare
The tables compares five European nations in terms of sales...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64224137931 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61662783572 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508620689655 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8827903912 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.7 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260826171572 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127332453122 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128530323427 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2296536293 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131511368204 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.