It is easier and more affordable for people to visit/travel to other nations. Is this positive/negative development?
In recent decades, international tourism has significantly developed thanks to globalization, and people can easily travel to foreign countries at a reasonable cost. Although some people argue visiting other countries without any obstacles and challenges will lead to many potential problems, the opposite is true.
It is clear that going abroad with fewer difficulties can bring a myriad of benefits to travelers. First, since visitors can afford to pay for their international trips, this allows them to explore, learn, and experience more extraordinary things, helping them feel more exhilarated and broaden their knowledge as well. For example, many people, especially thrill-seekers can travel to the South Pole, which is different from where they are living because this is the coldest place on the Earth with endangered species such as polar bears and penguins. Second, if there are more and more people visiting other nations, the tourism industry will earn huge profits from the demand for accommodations and hospitality services from these visitors. This ensures governments receive huge tax revenue from this industry and spend it improving other aspects such as education and healthcare, raising citizens’ standards of living.
Nevertheless, it should be noted that there are also some downsides to this trend.
First, easily going to other countries, especially developed countries, at a low cost would encourage travelers to find possible ways to stay or even settle down in these countries where they can earn more money. For instance, without pressure from Malaysian customs inspection, poor females living in the Western corner of Vietnam can travel and work illegally in some Malaysian bars and clubs where they could increase their income without paying taxes to either the Vietnamese or Malaysian governments. Moreover, there will be an outbreak of deadly diseases from infectious viruses and bacteria in their countries as a result if they go back to their hometowns from other countries with zones of pandemics or epidemics. For example, since foreign visitors booked flights to go back to their homes after holidays in the capital of China, where coronaviruses appeared and were rampant, millions of innocent people all around the world were infected by covid-19 and died of difficulty breathing, thereby affecting the economy of many countries and taking more than two years to recover it.
In conclusion, nowadays people can afford and visit foreign countries will be a positive trend and should be encouraged now and down the road. By acknowledging the possible drawbacks of this trend, governments and the public can be more cautious in protecting themselves from potential risks when traveling to other countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-06 | chauthithuyvy | 73 | view |
- The tables compares five European nations in terms of sales of Fairtrade labbelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 Overall most five countries saw an overall increase in sales of both coffee but sales of Fairtrade bananas only went up in three out of 10
- It is easier and more affordable for people to visit travel to other nations Is this positive negative development 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and Fairtrade labelled bananas in five European countries between 1999 and 2004 81
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tential problems, the opposite is true. It is clear that going abroad with fewer...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 260, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customs'' or 'custom's'?
Suggestion: customs'; custom's
...stance, without pressure from Malaysian customs inspection, poor females living in the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1091, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...king more than two years to recover it. In conclusion, nowadays people can affor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2329.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45433255269 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82751560286 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6413765553 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.357142857 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273368180017 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949601057963 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519209849031 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151612832608 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655784033724 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tential problems, the opposite is true. It is clear that going abroad with fewer...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 260, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customs'' or 'custom's'?
Suggestion: customs'; custom's
...stance, without pressure from Malaysian customs inspection, poor females living in the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1091, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...king more than two years to recover it. In conclusion, nowadays people can affor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2329.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45433255269 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82751560286 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6413765553 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.357142857 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273368180017 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949601057963 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519209849031 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151612832608 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655784033724 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.