The plans below show a small theatre In 2010 and the same theatre in 2012

Essay topics:

The plans below show a small theatre In 2010, and the same theatre in 2012.

The map compares the changes in the theatre in two years between 2010 and 2012. Overall, some sectors remained unchanged but the total area was extended to contain more facilities.

From the main gate, the ticket office and the admin office were placed on the left in 2010 and these were substituted by the restaurant in 2012. Although the admin office was moved to the corner between the restaurant and the auditorium, the ticket office had to relocate to the old cafe on the opposite side of the restaurant. The auditorium was upgraded by building a small door on the left side.

Turning to remainders, the dressing room on the top was replaced by expanding the stage to double the old stage size in 2012 and the corridor was built behind the stage. Besides, the storage was located on the left hand in 2010 and it was removed to the right hand in 2012. The dressing room behind the stage was rebuilt at the left including the shower sector.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-09 Ahmad_off 84 view
2024-09-09 Ahmad_off 84 view
2024-09-08 mrsaidovs@mail.ru 70 view
2024-08-16 Saul 67 view
2024-08-16 Saul 67 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63313609467 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35254544729 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508875739645 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8363841231 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122156302383 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629747524963 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810113803318 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912185570901 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498988431133 0.0819641961636 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.