Some children spend hours everyday on their smartphones.
Why is this case?
Do you think is a positive or a negative development?
It is a fact that juvenile spend their leisure time on smartphones to doing different activities. This is happened because of people rely on technology. However, I personally deem that it is depend on the use of phone, sometimes it is beneficial, while sometime it has detrimental effect on the children health. I will discuss the both point in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, there are ample of good reasons to use phone. The most remarkable reason is children can learn many things with the help of the phone. Such as, they should watch educational videos or play some puzzle games, which can help to build self confidence. The second most important reason is nowadays all the information available on internet, so they can use it to improve their general knowledge. Sometimes phone is useful for online education for students. Such as, during the Covid 19 pandemic students learned their subjects to attend online classes. At the end, smartphones are important for children, if they use it in right direction.
On the other hand, there are plenty of reasons that smartphones are not good for children. The significant reason behind this phenomenon is smartphone release some ultraviolet wave, which is not appropriate for human bodies. Apart from that, if young generations use smartphones for watching video or movies regularly, that time it effect their eyesight, they loss their vision. Such as, in today’s society 7 to 8 years children have this problem in the world.
Therefore all the basis of all the points till and my personal experience as well. I would like to state in conclusion that smartphones are essential for children but it is depend on the use. The most important thing is it is parents responsibility to teach their children how to use smartphones.
- The changes in town from toady to upcoming time 67
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 73
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one are of Britain The table show where the money come from and the chart show how it was distributed 78
- Traditional museums served as knowledge centre for historical and cultural aspects with the increasing use of internet museums have become obsolete Do you agree or disagree 73
- The line graph below show the consumption of 3 different types of fast food in Britain from 1970 to 1990 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
.... However, I personally deem that it is depend on the use of phone, sometimes it is be...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effects'?
Suggestion: effects
...video or movies regularly, that time it effect their eyesight, they loss their vision....
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...dren have this problem in the world. Therefore all the basis of all the points till an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...es are essential for children but it is depend on the use. The most important thing is...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03367003367 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80210751132 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2479135106 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0555555556 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173305577124 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587281148039 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484319990575 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118961510793 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041831194466 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
.... However, I personally deem that it is depend on the use of phone, sometimes it is be...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effects'?
Suggestion: effects
...video or movies regularly, that time it effect their eyesight, they loss their vision....
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...dren have this problem in the world. Therefore all the basis of all the points till an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...es are essential for children but it is depend on the use. The most important thing is...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03367003367 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80210751132 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2479135106 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0555555556 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173305577124 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587281148039 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484319990575 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118961510793 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041831194466 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.