The line graph below show the consumption of 3 different types of fast food in Britain from 1970 to 1990

Essay topics:

The line graph below show the consumption of 3 different types of fast food in Britain from 1970 to 1990.

The line graph illustrates about the consumption of three different fast foods namely hamburger, fish& chips and pizza by Britain public from the 1970 to 1990.

Overall, it can be clear from the graph that consumption of fish and chips were at their minimum position in the beginning of period. Whereas, in the end it was at top position.

By analysing data, it is clear evidence that hamburger and fish and chips were at almost some stage 20 and 80 gram respectively in 1970. After 10 years both augmented litter bit hamburger was at 99 and fish and chips were 150 grams consumed by Britain people. However, fish and chips were increased significantly in last two years, at the end it was achieved top position 500 grams. Whereas, hamburger was at 300 grams.

By analysing further data, in 1970 pizza was most popular in Britain, maximum people liked to eat pizza, it was major consumption rather than others in that time 300 grams. Whereas, in other 10 years it alleviated rapidly, in 1985 it was at 200 grams and it was almost steady till 1990.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (10 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-06 bhatt00 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...um position in the beginning of period. Whereas, in the end it was at top position. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...ips were at almost some stage 20 and 80 gram respectively in 1970. After 10 years bo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...it was achieved top position 500 grams. Whereas, hamburger was at 300 grams. By ana...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71351351351 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47382203708 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0667283016 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8888888889 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182703636178 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087131995289 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142546007204 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170533629362 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177794772698 0.0819641961636 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.