Look at the bar charts below. Think about how they differ. They show very different approaches to time management.
The bar charts describes the hours spent studying of three difference teenagers in 1 week before the final examination.
Student C had a bad habit in learning that his procrastination in pratise the acadamic knowledge before the exam was account for most of time in this week.
With student A who spent his time fund hugely appropriate which had increased sightly per day and reached a peak at 4 hours for studing in sunday, in contrast student B had studied hard-working in the first five day with 3 hours each day and not only had it reduced sightly in friday and saturday, but also he had all day for entertaining in sunday.
The last student can be a bit a procrastinator, he was postpone his preparing in almost all time of the week and he only came back for learning in the last 2 day with more than 5 hours and 10 hours in saturday and sunday, respectively
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-09 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that watching television is bad for children Other people believe that watching television is educational for children Which opinion do you agree with and why 89
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 67
- Reporting of crimes and other kinds of violent news on television and in newspapers can have adverse consquences This kind of information should be restricted from being shown in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Leisure time in a typical week in hour by sex and employment status 19 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar charts describes the hours spent...
^^
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'describe'.
Suggestion: describe
The bar charts describes the hours spent studying of three diffe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1 week before the final examination. Student C had a bad habit in learning th...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ccount for most of time in this week. With student A who spent his time fund h...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d all day for entertaining in sunday. The last student can be a bit a procrast...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 709.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48734177215 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78455838908 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.219541486 43.030603864 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 177.25 112.824112599 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.5 22.9334400587 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0624609114259 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05235474007 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509662105589 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.05235474007 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509662105589 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.