Some people say that the main aim of advertising is to improve the sales of products that people do not really need. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that the purpose of advertisement is to increase the sales of merchandises that are inessential for buyers. I somewhat disagree with this viewpoint, even though the promotion channel can be harnessed to stamp out manufacturers' inventory in order to garner some financial benefits.
Apart from disseminating information of out-moded products, advertisements can foster brand image and popularize newly launched offerings. It is not uncommon that companies utilize the marketing instrument to introduce their philosophies and burnish their public images. This can be materialized by social campaigns and sponsoring for local major events that manifest their values, rendering enteprises closer to the masses. Another virtue of advertising is that it spurs the awareness of spenders with trendy items. Before advent of certain products, advantages including organic materials, eco-friendly characteristics are often broadcast to occupy the minds of potential buyers. The approach not only boosts the chance that customers purchase the particular products, but enhances brand identities associated with products and services.
Admittedly, products with unenviable sales sometimes need a dose of promotion, allowing companies to reap part of manufaturing expenditure, improving bottom lines. If the companies fail to deliver successful advertisements, losses would be exacerbated. Utiliztion of advert this way therefore is barely implemented among the manufacturing industry.
In sum, there are other uses of advetisements in lieu of enhancing revenue from products with poor sales, albeit circulating about the products can be exploited in few situations. I mostly object to the notion that ads are mostly deployed to generate income from less interested products.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-12 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
2023-06-11 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
2023-06-11 | Charles Le | 61 | view |
2023-06-11 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
2023-05-31 | Pham Van Nhan | 89 | view |
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advanced technology which can prevent and solve the crime Do you agree or disagree 84
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 89
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Government should support care vs finance for retired people while others believe that they should save money when they get older Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98443579767 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20775057236 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677042801556 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.749224265 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.307692308 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.61538461538 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114122923705 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374923415128 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053761067163 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718562324922 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468614021398 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.21 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.