Many people feel that urban environments are more unhealthy than they have ever been. What do you think are the main causes of this problem? What measures can be effective in tackling this problem?
Nowadays, increasingly more people are not satisfied with urban conditions in different aspects. This situation is the result of various factors and personally, I think responsibilities lie with the governments to find concrete solutions.
The primary cause of unhealthy urban environments is related to immigration to cities for their facilities and living standards. Overpopulation in cities is combined with poor traffic which leads to pollution such as air, noise as well as stress. In this case, cities with insufficient transport infrastructure are likely to suffer the most. In addition, urban dwellers are driving hectic lives because of bad work-life balance and work demands in different competitive industries. Other drawbacks such as increasing crime rates, costs of living, and rental fees involve in the reasons why urban life is no longer considered appealing.
There are a couple of measures governments should take to tackle these problems. Firstly, public services, in particular healthcare, police force, education, and transport, need to be improved to occupy millions of people. Meanwhile, national authorities can reduce the gap between urban and rural areas through equal subsidize so that there will be fewer immigrants to cities and demand for needs in urban facilities. Another action is to encourage companies to keep employees satisfied by promoting work-life balance, giving personal rewards, and arranging social events. Finally, more green spaces such as parks and roof-top gardens can be built to maintain air quality while at the same time helping local residents healthy and active.
In conclusion, the so-called ‘unhealthy urban life’ is caused by problems like inadequate infrastructure and hectic lifestyles. However, fortunately, governments can address this situation by the aforementioned simple long-term planning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-14 | Aung | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-25 | alinabizada | 95 | view |
| 2020-08-30 | Linhjane | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | koinoyokan | 54 | view |
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 61
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fe is no longer considered appealing. There are a couple of measures governmen...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tioned simple long-term planning.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88727272727 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08143145871 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683636363636 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7696085268 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.642857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184668339153 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580219604683 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395470769753 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112927518965 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031392751006 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.