Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive development?
Today, using smartphones has become a regular activity for children. There are several reasons behind this trend and despite having some negative impact on addiction and health, I believe positives are more significant.
The main reason why young people are addicted to phones is because of the social benefits they offer. With the availability of the Internet, we can make new friends, chat with our peers and keep in touch with them without restrictions of distance. The advent of free mobile games also makes the attraction stronger. Strategy and multi-player games are so stimulating and realistic that children insist on playing for long hours. In addition, young adults solely rely on smartphones to study, explore new information, or read global news.
Addiction to using smartphones can lead to negative effects such as sedentary lifestyles. Having excess screen time is not ideal for health as children lack physical activities and tire their eyesight. This habit may even cause health problems like obesity, muscular and optical problems in the long run. However, on the positive side, phones and the Internet provide a learning platform for youngsters. For example, children can extend their studies and improve their language skills by browsing educational websites. Most importantly, this eye-opening device introduces the extensive use of technology to the future generation.
In conclusion, children today spend hours on their smartphones because they fulfill their entertainment and social needs. In my opinion, it is a positive development, and with proper guidance from elders, children can make effective use of phones for educational and personal improvements.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- If we want to save the future of the planet we will have to drastically change our way of life What is your opinion 92
- The graph below shows predictions about the number of people who will study three major world languages between 2020 and 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this a positive or a negative development 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56589147287 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85060589509 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65503875969 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5226108988 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.7333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211629594542 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646576993154 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527750750703 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135962193141 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556568929921 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.