Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, improvements in technology have had a significant influence on human communication. It impacts our relationships in several ways and personally, I think it is a positive development.
Technology has greatly affected the way people communicate for all business, social, and educational purposes today. For example, most businessmen arrange discussions for trades on online platforms such as Skype without ever meeting once in life. If we look at education, a variety of online courses in different studies are offered on the Internet. Since teachers conduct lectures via Zoom and it is no longer mandatory for students to be physically at the campus. Also in social life, young people tend to surf Facebook, chatting with friends, making new ones, and finding peers with common interests. Gathering at cafes and tea shops in a traditional way is becoming less common among friends.
Advancement in technology has removed any boundary we face in interacting with each other. Firstly, in the past, the cooperation of companies used to be limited to writing and telegram. However, now, with the availability of the Internet, heads of organizations can virtually meet from any corner of the world and this has flourished the economic growth. On the other hand, there are some drawbacks in the social aspect by isolating close people and discouraging talking face-to-face. In my opinion, online relationships are poor substitutes for real relationships.
In conclusion, technology has revolutionized the interaction between people. Without technology and online platforms, humankind would still be outdated and confined in each area of the world.
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- If we want to save the future of the planet we will have to drastically change our way of life What is your opinion 92
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 61
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year 84
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 638, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a traditional way" with adverb for "traditional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rests. Gathering at cafes and tea shops in a traditional way is becoming less common among friends. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nfined in each area of the world.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, still, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54509803922 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18661174686 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670588235294 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6723936733 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.2666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263749489731 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779855264679 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693518388871 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14643054016 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00796435423784 0.056905535591 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.