The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that many people have valued that rising fuel price is an effective method to solve environmental problems. While I accept that this might be helpful at some point, I believe that there are many other terrific ways to take into account.
Imposing an increase on fuel may partly alleviate environmental problems. By adopting this policy, it ensures that people would use their cars less. As a result, it might lead to a reduction in exhaust emissions because of fewer car journeys. For instance, due to raising taxes on gasoline in the first month of 2023, there was a decline in the number of people using car since most of their car run by fuel.
However, increasing the cost of fuel alone would not the biggest change in tackling international environmental problems as there are plenty of measurements that are much more efficient. However, it all boils down to the government to throw their weight behind protecting the environment. Firstly, they should introduce restrictions on the use of private vehicles to reduce the reliance on fossil fuel as a whole, which not only helps reduce the depletion of natural sources, but also improves the air quality, which is seriously polluted. Secondly, the government ought to allocate resources to alternative energy sources such as wind power or hybrid to cut down on emissions. For example, in California, the amount of carbon emissions has decreased significantly over recent years because many citizens use hybrid cars instead of those run by gasoline.
In conclusion, while raising the fuel's price is beneficial to deplete environmental degradation, however, it is no mean key element to tackle environmental pollution as there are way more other helpful solutions should be promoted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13986013986 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85993467898 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604895104895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8305969479 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156311812361 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581190028394 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701880202025 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920372618223 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217519391087 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.