The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996, 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia
The table shows data about the amount of visitors paying a visit to six different World Heritage sites in Australia in three years 1996,1998,2000
As can be inferred from the table, it is apparent that the majority of tourists spent their time visiting Great Barrier Reef,with the number far surpassing other categories . It is also worth noting that the figures for Great Barrier Reef, Blue Mountains and Tasmania Wilderness witnessed dramatic growth, in contrast to a constant drop in the number of visitors coming to Central Eastern Rainforest Reserve.
In 1996, Great Barrier Reef welcomed 1,670,000 visitors. This figure then increased considerably and reached its peak at 3,200,000 people in 2000, which was the highest number among 6 heritage sites examined. Meanwhile, a minimal growth was seen in the number of tourists visiting Blue Mountains and Wilderness between 1996 and 2000, 55,000 and 33,000 people, respectively.
Conversely, the amount of people going to Central Eastern Rainforest Reserve decreased noticeably, from 810,000 in 1996 to 770,000 people in 2000. A similar pattern was seen in the statistics for visitors in Shark Bay. On the other hand, the amount of visitors in Macquarie Island observed a drop from 350 to 310 people in 1998, followed by a slight rise in 2020.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | Bennhehe | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | lnthuyvan | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-02 | Johndavisvu | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008 78
- People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 77
- People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , with
...t their time visiting Great Barrier Reef,with the number far surpassing other categor...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e number far surpassing other categories . It is also worth noting that the figure...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, if, so, then, while, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22966507177 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70433011309 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612440191388 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.4760183955 43.030603864 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.625 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 5.23603664747 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232756547301 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960248477139 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592274306919 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155595402263 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103370095902 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.