Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just a waste of money. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Protecting wild fauna in the contemporary world is said to be unworthy as those species do not bring any benefits to humankind. I wholly disagree with this idea due to their impact on tourism and the ecosystem that they live in.
To begin with, wildlife preservation can increase a country’s visitorship. In regions with preservation sites, they contain exotic kinds of animals that people from other places might want to observe in real life. Illustrative of this is safaris in Africa, which are home to exclusive tropical animals like elephants or rhinos. The tourism-making appeal of these countries will create visitors’ demand for catering services and programs. Therefore, animal conservation may be a cost-effective way to promote economic growth for nations with opulent natural resources and readily available facilities. It can provide indigenous people with prosperous job opportunities without much additional investment and help stabilize their lives.
With regard to the environment, protecting wild animals can retain biodiversity. There is no denying that fauna and flora are inherently related to each other. While the latter provides habitat for the former, animals when decomposing are valuable sources of nutrients for trees. Hence, preserving animal populations in the wild would also encourage floral species to flourish, thereby maintaining the ecological balance. This is specially accurate in areas with high forest canopy density such as Indonesia where animal protection has an important role to play in slowing down or even halting deforestation. As a result, it would save significant amounts of money that would otherwise be spent on restoring natural landscapes.
In conclusion, I believe that wildlife conservation at present is worthy of investments, with its being a cost-efficient way to prevent ecological disasters and promote tourism of a country.
- the graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 84
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- ok
- Some people claim that employers should not be concerned about the way employees dress but only about the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62369337979 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09441408211 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672473867596 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1490849072 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220050029196 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690618694878 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411539253985 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114173366487 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598399608609 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.