Some people today believe that it is acceptable to use physical force to discipline children, but others feel it is completely unacceptable.
Discuss this view and give your opinion.
Nowadays, many people think that using violence can be the best way to make children more obedient. However, others do not think this method can benefit children. In this essay, I will discuss this view and give my opinion. First of all, many children often do not understand well what is right or wrong, and just explaining with words is not enough because they are not enough mature to think clearly about what is told. In this instance, the most effective way to let them realize what they have done is to give them some corporal punishment so that they can remember the physical pain. The parents contend that this help prevents the children from do the same mistakes again and also the children think twice before any mistake. In addition, to make children disciplined, speaking softly does not seem to work. For example, when a child cries, many parents tend to use physical force to make him or her stop crying. On the other hand, using physical force can not actually work in some situations. To begin with, if parents often use violence with their children, he or she can easily imitate. As a result, their children can easily become a violent person and they can be very hard to make friends at school. Meanwhile, children are vulnerable people, so using the wrong physical force can easily affect their behavior. He or she can easily fall into depression and become afraid of everything. So they will not try to do anything because they are afraid that they can be punished more. In conclusion, even though physical punishment can help parents, I believe that it should not be used due to its negative impacts on children’s minds.
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is this the case What can be done to attract local people 73
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 100
- The graph below shows the three different kinds of emission sources oil coal gas of greenhouse gas in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the UK the rest of Europe and Japan from 1993 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72822299652 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3690817652 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557491289199 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.308919762 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22988472126 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931432832792 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746397174681 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22988472126 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.