Critics say that current voting systems used in the United States are inefficient and often lead to the inaccurate counting of votes. Miscounts can be especially damaging if an election is closely contested. Those critics would like the traditional systems to be replaced with far more efficient and trustworthy computerized voting systems.
In traditional voting, one major source of inaccuracy is that people accidentally vote for the wrong candidate. Voters usually have to find the name of their candidate on a large sheet of paper containing many names—the ballot—and make a small mark next to that name. People with poor eyesight can easily mark the wrong name. The computerized voting machines have an easy-to-use touch-screen technology: to cast a vote, a voter needs only to touch the candidate’s name on the screen to record a vote for that candidate; voters can even have the computer magnify the name for easier viewing.
Another major problem with old voting systems is that they rely heavily on people to count the votes. Officials must often count up the votes one by one, going through every ballot and recording the vote. Since they have to deal with thousands of ballots, it is almost inevitable that they will make mistakes. If an error is detected, a long and expensive recount has to take place. In contrast, computerized systems remove the possibility of human error, since all the vote counting is done quickly and automatically by the computers.
Finally some people say it is too risky to implement complicated voting technology nationwide. But without giving it a thought, governments and individuals alike trust other complex computer technology every day to be perfectly accurate in banking transactions as well as in the communication of highly sensitive information.
The reading text and lecturer are both about the currant voting system in USA. While the author feels that, old system in not a efficient to count the vote and he want the new computer base voting system. at the same time lecturer disputes all these claims and said that, new voting system is not very reliable.
First of all, the reading text suggests that, people with poor eyesight, often accidantely choose the wrong candidets. However, lecturer refuses that and said that, people with, who used to the computer system will take benefits from this system. But, on the other hand what abou the people who are not used to the computer, will lead to misunderstood the voting system.
Furthermore, reading passage claim that, this old system is heavily depends on the people. In contrast to that, professor states that, computer base voting system will worked on the different coding program. Moreover, the human error in the code will resulted in the loss or addition of lot of vote. On top of that, if will create serious problem in front of the voting agency.
In last, old ballot based voting system is inaccurate an author want accurate voting system. To opposes that, lecturer goes on to says that, computer are heavily used in the baking system, since a very long time. So, programmer were frequently improved this system. On the on the other end, computer which are used in voting system are use once every two years and some time twice a tear in local election, Because of that, there are no chance to improve that new voting system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Shimakaze514 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Shimakaze514 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-17 | YACHI PATEL | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-17 | YACHI PATEL | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he author feels that, old system in not a efficient to count the vote and he want...
^
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...ot a efficient to count the vote and he want the new computer base voting system. at...
^^^^
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
...nt the new computer base voting system. at the same time lecturer disputes all the...
^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'work'
Suggestion: work
... that, computer base voting system will worked on the different coding program. Moreov...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...eover, the human error in the code will resulted in the loss or addition of lot of vote....
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'On the'.
Suggestion: On the
...r were frequently improved this system. On the on the other end, computer which are used in v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, in contrast, first of all, in contrast to, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76951672862 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20648176841 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520446096654 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 2.5761589404 349% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6891340006 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6428571429 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265363123852 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115938676203 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651982967713 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184898162121 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533736493351 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.