Traditions are about the past and innovation is about the future, and it has been argued that we need to let go of traditions for the sake of progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this? What role should traditions have in our lives?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Traditions and innovation are both important aspects of society, but they serve different purposes. Traditions help us maintain a connection to our past, while innovation drives us towards a better future. In my opinion, it is not necessary to let go of traditions entirely for the sake of progress, as they can coexist with innovation and contribute to our personal and collective identity.
Traditions serve as a reminder of our cultural heritage, and they can provide a sense of belonging and continuity in a rapidly changing world. They can be a source of comfort and strength during difficult times, and they can help us maintain a connection to our ancestors and our roots. For example, in my own culture, we celebrate traditional festivals and follow customs and rituals that have been passed down for generations. These traditions provide continuity and a sense of belonging to the community.
However, innovation is also important for progress and growth. It drives us forward and helps us create new opportunities and possibilities. Innovation has led to many advancements in fields such as technology, medicine, and transportation, and it has improved our quality of life in many ways. For instance, the development of the internet and smartphones has transformed the way we communicate and access information, making our lives more convenient.
In my opinion, traditions and innovation can coexist and even complement each other. We can preserve traditions while embracing innovation to create new possibilities and opportunities. For instance, we can use technology to promote and preserve traditional art forms or to make traditional knowledge more accessible to a wider audience. We can also use innovation to create new traditions that reflect our changing world and our evolving values.
In conclusion, traditions and innovation serve different purposes, but they can coexist and complement each other. raditions provide a link to our past and help us maintain a sense of identity and continuity, while innovation drives us towards a better future and creates new opportunities and possibilities. Both are important for a balanced and fulfilling life, and we should strive to find a way to embrace both in our lives.
- It has been noted that many people who had a big impact on the world gave themselves completely to their work and did not bother with the idea of work life balance To what extent should people try to have a good work life balance Give reasons for your ans 61
- Traditions are about the past and innovation is about the future and it has been argued that we need to let go of traditions for the sake of progress To what extent do you agree or disagree with this What role should traditions have in our lives Give reas 67
- It is sometimes said that travel broadens the mind To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 67
- Some people consider art to be essential and others think it is not Which view do you agree with and why 84
- Internet social media have become very popular To what extent do you think this is a good or bad thing Why do you think this is the case 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Raditions
... can coexist and complement each other. raditions provide a link to our past and help us ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 10.4138276553 326% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34463276836 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21290647894 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457627118644 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4171645868 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28010204579 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105480676098 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543092434522 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177809218619 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056864795768 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Raditions
... can coexist and complement each other. raditions provide a link to our past and help us ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 10.4138276553 326% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34463276836 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21290647894 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457627118644 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4171645868 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28010204579 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105480676098 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543092434522 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177809218619 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056864795768 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.