The charts show information about children learning musical instruments in 1996 and 2016 in the UK.
The charts illustrate the figure of children who learn musical instruments between 1996 and 2016 in the UK
Overall, What stands out from the graphs is a gradual increase in the percentage of children learning a musical instrument. Besides that, it can be easily seen that the number of children who enrolled to study keyboard and piano was very crowned.
Looking at the pie charts for more detail, the number of children who were not interested in learning musical instruments in 1996 made up more than half the children’s figure, however, after the next 10 years, there was a significant decrease in that number and it just took the responsibility for a quarter.
Regarding the bar chart, the piano was an instrument that was the favorite subject of children in 1996, with 30%. Following that is the keyboard with more than 20%, while just over 10% the number of children learning electric guitar and violin at 12% and 13%, respectively, and children studying more than one instrument took up 11% at the same time. Over 10 years, the learner of keyboards increased significantly and reach the highest figure, at 30%, whereas, the percentage of piano learner experimented a slight decrease to nearly 26%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Giang Tran | 88 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Giang Tran | 75 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Giang Tran | 91 | view |
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro Given is the line chart illustrating the average monthly spending on four cell phones in 67
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 78
- Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 56
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The charts illustrate the figure of chil...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uments between 1996 and 2016 in the UK Overall, What stands out from the g...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...keyboard and piano was very crowned. Looking at the pie charts for more detai...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ok the responsibility for a quarter. Regarding the bar chart, the piano was a...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nted a slight decrease to nearly 26%.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, look, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04433497537 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7437052791 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546798029557 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.4464221941 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.666666667 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8333333333 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311969456188 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166593092747 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154905453253 0.0843802449381 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259531775331 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161661811008 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.