Some people trust their first impressions about person’s character because they believe that these judgements are generally correct. Other people don’t judge ones quickly because they believe it’s worng. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
Several individuals argue that people should put their belief in their ability to conjecture a person’s personality when they catch first sight. While it is true to some extent, I still suppose that occasionally judging ones could be imprecise. In this essay below, I will discuss both perspectives and give several detailed explanations.
On the one hand, people believe in their judgments when they hold an opinion of the first opponent’s expression. Indeed, several people will tend to illustrate their attitudes and behaviors subconsciously. This is because it is absorbed in their characteristic and depicted it via their daily habits. For example, a confident staff always creates preeminent impressions in the eye of recruiters. It is extremely easy to differentiate from other candidates because he or she shows it through decisive steps, concise words, and facial expressions full of confidence, and to possess this, he or she has nurtured through participating in outdoor activities and building characteristics for himself or herself.
On the other hand, several people do not acquiesce with this above perspective. It is obviously true that the hardest item that is guessing the genuine nature of humans. To illustrate, several individuals show off their politeness and kindness in the community, however, they are hiding a dark aspect inside their personality. The murderer, for example, initially, will treat the victims well, but once the victim is trapped, the killer will reveal their true nature and act in a barbaric manner. As a result, sometimes people cannot give a comprehensive assessment of a person at first sight.
In conclusion, sometimes judging an individual’s first performance will yield the right consequences, but I believe that will not give the whole truth about their character.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | thaokim2003 | 73 | view |
- In many countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more widely available Do the disadvantages of this outweigh the advantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree You should write at lea 89
- Some people trust their first impressions about person s character because they believe that these judgements are generally correct Other people don t judge ones quickly because they believe it s worng Discuss both view and give your own opinion 73
- The rise of social media platforms has made it easier for people to vent their frustrations and complaints publicly What is the consequence of this trend Is there any benefit to expressing complaints on social media 67
- Many adults nowadays prefer spending their free time playing computer games Why do they do this Is this a positive or negative development 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a barbaric manner" with adverb for "barbaric"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r will reveal their true nature and act in a barbaric manner. As a result, sometimes people cannot g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42605633803 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12556085029 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598591549296 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8963548299 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.071428571 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28798278916 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941262976633 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695157271073 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171410100956 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381230326019 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a barbaric manner" with adverb for "barbaric"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r will reveal their true nature and act in a barbaric manner. As a result, sometimes people cannot g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42605633803 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12556085029 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598591549296 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8963548299 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.071428571 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28798278916 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941262976633 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695157271073 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171410100956 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381230326019 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.