The graph below shows transport preferences among young people from different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows transport preferences among young people from different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar chart indicates vehicle priority of youngsters consisting of automobiles, motorcycles and bicycles in distinctive regions around the world.

Overall, cars are the most prevalent vehicle for the young generation in four countries, as opposed to motorcycles which are less selected by young people than other means of transport excluding the USA. It is noticeable that in Germany, the young generation in Germany are more interested in bicycles than other vehicles.

Regarding the rate of youngsters using cars in Great Britain is identical to the USA, with the figure being at 60%. By contrast, the proportion of counterparts selecting cars as their main vehicle in Germany and France makes up for 40% and approximately 75% respectively. In addition, there are 10% of young people in Great Britain who choose motorcycles as their main transport, compared to 30% of young people consider motorcycles as their preferred transport which is triple the rate of people using cars in Great Britain. On the other hand, the disparity of youngsters who select motorcycles as their main vehicle between Germany and France is insignificant, with the figure being at approximately 15% and 10% respectively.

It can be observed from the chart that the proportion of the young generation in Great Britain choosing bicycles as their most-liked transport accounted for 30% which is triple the percentage of young people using bicycles to move consistently in daily life. Additionally, there are around 45% of youngsters in Germany choosing bicycles as their main vehicle which is the largest contributor in all four countries and almost triple the percentage of young citizens showing interest in bicycles in France, with the figure being at around 15%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-22 nijam 73 view
2023-09-12 maiphuonganh 73 view
2023-08-27 nobitaa 67 view
2023-08-27 nobitaa 67 view
2023-06-16 ililmaidatuz 78 view
Essays by user nobitaa :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 965.302439024 154% => OK
No of words: 278.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34892086331 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96050158575 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431654676259 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 283.868780488 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3694068354 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.222222222 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8888888889 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162310629608 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727231724767 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543717903795 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916445021221 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539687311718 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.