The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.
The line graphs below depict how many the number of commuters use car, bus and train to travel in the UK from 1970 to 2030.
As can be seen from the line graphs, car line had an upward trend. It is the same as train but lower level than car. While how many people who choose bus services downward tendency.
Overall, the most popular transport is car at 5 million in 1970. In contrast, the public vehicle is bus was at 4 million passengers at the same time.It is a great signal when the amount of commuters pick car to drive increased substantially above 6 million in 2000. According to expectation, the average number of UK who use car to move will reach a peak at around 9 million in 2030. Meanwhile, bus had a positive indication over the period shown. Between 1970 and 2030, the number of travelers declined slightly till 2030 when the number beneath 3 million.
Finally, how many consumers use train at only 2 million in the UK at first. Span of next 30 years, the figure was improve minimally at 3 million passengers in 2000. Over time, the average costumers rose to some under 5 million in 2030. Although train line did not climbed enormously too much, but during the 60 years period, this queue increased steadily. In the UK, how many populations who pick car, bus and train respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
- Percentage of total music sales by method 78
- Average annual spending on mobile phones domestic and international fixed services 2001 2010 56
- the bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in Canada in 1998 and 2005 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Money Spent on Books 73
- the bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in canada in 1998 and 2005 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'traveling', 'travelling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: traveling; travelling
...ber of commuters use car, bus and train to travel in the UK from 1970 to 2030. As can be...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...same as train but lower level than car. While how many people who choose bus services...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bus'
Suggestion: to bus
...n car. While how many people who choose bus services downward tendency. Overall, t...
^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...t 4 million passengers at the same time.It is a great signal when the amount of co...
^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'improved'.
Suggestion: improved
.... Span of next 30 years, the figure was improve minimally at 3 million passengers in 2...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ove minimally at 3 million passengers in 2000. Over time, the average costumers r...
^^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'climb'
Suggestion: climb
...on in 2030. Although train line did not climbed enormously too much, but during the 60 ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53191489362 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48291217618 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565957446809 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.117768635 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0714285714 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7857142857 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346445649749 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126941193542 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127843441772 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253530300844 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156711159583 0.0819641961636 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.