The bar chart shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.
The bar chart below expresses the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.
In generally, girls performed better in almost subjects than boys in the competency exams, except for geography. Foreign languages, Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics were subjects with scores that are not too different between the two genders.
In females, Computer Science had the highest score compare to all the other subjects at around 56,3% while boys approximately 42,1% in this subject. Mathematics, Foreign Language and Physical were subjects which both men and women had similar scores. There were 49,2% for girls and 48,4% for boys in Mathematics. Similar, in Foreign Language girls higher than boys at 1% (47,4%). Approximately 36,7% girls passed in Physics, it only had a difference of around 2% in foreign languages for exact 34,6% of boys. Followed that, the percentage of girls graduated in History rate were 25,6%, this number were higher 2,7% than that of male students.
During a year past, Chemistry and Geography were two subjects with very different graduated rates between men and women. Whereas, the amount of girls who diplomaed Chemistry by 30,2%, only 14,1% of boys pupils passed the subject. In contrast, at roughly 30,4% boys outperformed in Geography, and about elevate 10,1% than for female students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | Trịnh Trí Dũng | view | |
| 2023-02-15 | Trịnh Trí Dũng | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | Trịnh Trí Dũng | view | |
| 2022-07-28 | Hanabi | 73 | view |
- Average annual spending on mobile phones domestic and international fixed services 2001 2010 56
- the bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in canada in 1998 and 2005 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 78
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 67
- The bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in Canada in 1998 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, except for, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61645697603 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572727272727 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1704879065 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0833333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231232304797 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099285648 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.203139785068 0.0843802449381 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244408342205 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.300912717056 0.0819641961636 367% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.