Nowadays celebrities earn money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it positive or negative development?
In the contemporary world, famous individuals tend to monetize more than politicians. To make this situation more definite, I will support a primary explanation and express the difficult outcome of this.
The main reason that elucidates this phenomenon is that well-known individuals can make money from numerous sources dependent on their influence and authority. In contrast, perhaps politicians can be responsible for a specific expertise field such as finance, education, and health. To illustrate, earning income via the number of viewers on social media is a casual pattern that is utilized by famous singers. Not only that, they can collaborate with various labored brands, advertise their commodities, and receive promotions per good sold. Nonetheless, politicians mainly concentrate on their concerns, hence their income is prone to be less than celebrities.
The occurrence of this situation has impacted on the society negatively. It is obviously true that even though a plethora of individuals are graduated with a bachelor related to politics, and economics majors, they have become influencers, and celebrities in real life. Because of the difference in income bracket, a part of them will struggle to make a living if they maintain their income based on their politicized careers. From that, they have been coerced to transfer to another field with appealing incomes such as influencers, and models although they truly have a competency with politics. This can cause a nerve-racking consequence about devoiding accomplished politicians for the nation.
In conclusion, celebrities’ ability to accumulate greater fortune than political figures is mainly catalyzed by their diversity in income sources. Therefore, a lack of erudite individuals can become one of the disadvantageous aspects that outweigh the advantages of this phenomenon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | sardarni kaur | 89 | view |
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree You should write at lea 89
- Many adults nowadays prefer spending their free time playing computer games Why do they do this Is this a positive or negative development 73
- The demand for online coaching services and video courses has grown significantly in the digital age Some now feel this method of learning is a superior option to in person learning To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The rise of social media platforms has made it easier for people to vent their frustrations and complaints publicly What is the consequence of this trend Is there any benefit to expressing complaints on social media 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6523297491 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17301283192 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609318996416 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2021675022 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.642857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160287688369 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560915813836 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398174039995 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955382829435 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227529929474 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.