Topic: The chart below shows the results of three surveys on absenteeism in a particular European country in the years 2000, 2005 and 2010. The results show the reasons people gave for not going to work.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates several potential reasons behind absenteeism among employees according to the three surveys in a certain European country between 2000 and 2010.
In general, it is apparent that there were mostly five primary excuses given from not going to work, including illness, stress, personal needs, family responsibilites, and unexpected for for problems. While most workers needed sick leave was the most common reason, the opposite was true for the stress reason.
Looking at the chart, employees often left work because of sickness gaining popularity, reaching nearly the peak of approximately 45% in 2000. This figure was pretty twice and three times as great as the percentage of personal needs and family responsibilities, respectively. In contrast, according to the first survey, stress issues were the least significant reason for workers to have a day off, standing over a tiny percent. Noticeably, unexpected problems such as transport, and weather were two folders compared to the ratio of stress issues.
In the next 5 years, there was a substantial decrease in the percentage of leaving work due to illness until the end of the examined period by merely a fifth. On the contrary, it witnessed an upward trend in terms of personal needs up to around 23% in 2010. In the meantime, both stress and unexpected matters experienced a considerable fluctuation during the rest period, finally making up roughly 13% for both. Regarding family responsibilities, the ratio declined slightly in 2005 and then leveled off for the rest period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-05 | Huyenlbg87 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-24 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
- The chart shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 84
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The diagrams show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 78
- Topic The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 The second graph shows the percentage of trains running on time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Topic The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors who came to the UK for different purposes between 1989 and 2009 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
... family responsibilites, and unexpected for for problems. While most workers needed sic...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, regarding, so, then, while, in contrast, in general, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3185483871 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94161171376 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 106.607317073 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649193548387 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5364780327 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.909090909 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164138648318 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599764370867 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605907201386 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116777708595 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700390882508 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.