The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995.
The two pie charts illustrate the proportion of numerous pursuit favorite activities that European residents enjoy in their spare time in 1985 and 1995.
In general, there was a disparity between entertainment activities that people most enjoyed in the two examined years. Of these activities, watching TV gained the most popular among European citizens for both two years. It is also notable that while talking with family saw an increase in 1995, the reverse was true for others.
Looking at the first chart, European adults had a whale of a time watching telly with various programs, accounting for 32%, leading the ratio of relaxation services in 1985. It is noticeable that this percentage of watching the box was approximately doubled as great as talking with family in their spare time. Following that, making up nearly 23%, eating out placed as the second most popular activity, which was just higher than 2% in comparison with talking with friends.
In stark contrast, however, all activities experienced a downward trend in popularity. Eating out, which was the second-highest outside activity in the past time, underwent a dramatic decline, standing at nearly one in ten in 1995. This figure was quite the same with talking with family activity. Meanwhile, there was a slight decrease in watching TV, nonetheless, it still played a major part in their free time. On the contrary, talking with friends become one of the top prioritized choices among European countries, rising to 26% in 1995. With the of the prosperity of cutting-edge technology, playing computer games witnessed a sharp skyrocket in popularity, accounting for around a third.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | Drake004 | 30 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | Drake004 | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-19 | Sherzod Parakhatov | 78 | view |
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainment 73
- Topic The graph below gives information about the price of bananas in four countries between 1984 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Topic Whether or not a person achieves their aims in life is mostly related to luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Topic The charts below show the performance of spending on roads and transport in four countries from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... second-highest outside activity in the past time, underwent a dramatic decline, standing...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 632, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nology, playing computer games witnessed a sharp skyrocket in popularity, account...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, look, nonetheless, second, so, still, third, while, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24719101124 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79287261948 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 106.607317073 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59925093633 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2294969394 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.769230769 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195588513195 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071564762352 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749745448633 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146256115784 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703655438379 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.