Some people believe that the best way to produce a happier society is to ensure that there are only small differences between the richest and the poorest members. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In our modern world, the gap between the rich and the poor is widening, leading to a significant disparity in society. Some individuals argue that to achieve contentment for all families, it is imperative to eliminate this class divide. I completely agree with this notion as reducing the gap between the wealthiest and the poorest can create equal opportunities for everyone and foster harmony within the community.
Firstly, individuals living below the poverty line often face unemployment and illiteracy. However, this issue can be easily resolved if economic inequality is eliminated. In impoverished countries like those in Africa, the unemployment rate is alarmingly high, while the elite enjoy a life of luxury. This socioeconomic gap not only hampers the growth of these nations but also affects the global community as a whole. By narrowing the differences, individuals will have access to equal opportunities and resources, which are considered their basic rights.
Secondly, developed nations have disregarded the importance of reducing this gap, which is a major contributor to their growth. In countries like the United States, individuals from all social backgrounds engage in various jobs throughout their lives, earning according to their abilities. However, society treats everyone with equal respect, irrespective of their profession. Consequently, our planet can become a happier place to live, and individuals can lead better lives. If societies embrace inclusivity, every individual will be given a chance to excel.
In conclusion, it is argued by some that eliminating economic differences is essential for fostering happiness. I firmly believe that treating everyone fairly is of utmost importance for us to grow and progress together. By bridging the gap between classes, we can create a society that provides equal opportunities to all and promotes harmony among its members.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people Do you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant
- Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen pencil or brush What are the reasons Is this a positive or a negative development 89
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant 78
- Some people believe that the best way to produce a happier society is to ensure that there are only small differences between the richest and the poorest members To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58965517241 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08042996211 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606896551724 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9831399906 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.3125 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.083417934202 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270160771334 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251966999052 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.055357535278 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321990983207 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.