The table below shows the amount of waste production (in million of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparion where relevants.
The table presents the quantity of garbage in six distinct nations in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
From an overall perspective, it is evident that the amount of trash of the US made up a major part among the countries. In addition, Ireland was the nation with the least waste production over the years.
At the beginning of the period, in 1980, the US discharged the largest amount of garbage with 131 million of ton. The figure for Japan was lower, at 28 million of ton while the data of Poland, Portugal and Japan were all below 4 million of ton. Moreover, there was no information related to Korea.
In the following years, America still remained in the top-ranking in garbage extraction with 151 million of ton in 1990, and it kept increasing until 2000 with 192 million of ton. In 1990, the figure for Japan and Korea were 32 and 31 million of ton, compared to Poland and Portugal with only 5 and 3 million of ton and no data showed for Ireland. In 2000, the quantity of trash in Japan was only below the US with 53 million of ton, while the figure for the remaining nations only ranges from 5 to 19 million of ton.
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 84
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What are the major causes of environmental damage Who are responsible for preventing environmental damage 89
- Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people believe that robots will play an important role in future societies while others argue that robots might have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Fewer young people do farming work in rural areas Why Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... of ton and no data showed for Ireland. In 2000, the quantity of trash in Japan wa...
^^
Line 7, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nly ranges from 5 to 19 million of ton.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4347826087 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34273119684 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487922705314 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9338520898 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123756159427 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629661147809 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235893611374 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836984298897 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153739305675 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.