The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
The table shows data on attendees of four types of secondary school from 2000 to 2009.
Overall, while three school types such as specialist, grammar and voluntary-controlled all saw a decrease in the proportions of pupils, community schools’ attendees had the most drastic increase over 9 years compared to the others. Moreover, there was a replacement of the first rank from voluntary-controlled to community schools between 2000 and 2009.
In 2000, voluntary-controlled was the most attended school type with over 50%, nearly four times more than that of specialist and community schools (12%). The second largest attended school type belonged to grammar with just under a quarter.
From 2001 to 2009, whilst specialist and grammar schools’ attendees dropped gradually, the remaining school types both changed significantly. Despite a slight fall to 38% in 2005, voluntary-controlled schools still remained at the top. However, the proportion of pupils in this type of school halved after 4 years and slipped to the second spot. An opposite pattern can be seen in community school type, from a second rank in 2005 to the top with a surge in the number of attendees after 4 years from 32% to 58%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-15 | reverjae | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Chyka | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
- Technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The maps below show the city of Eastminster in 1999 and 2009 73
- The chart below compares the number of people per household by percentage in the UK in 1981 and 2001 73
- Some people say the fashion industry has a bad effect on people s lives Do you agree 67
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, still, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17948717949 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31528050286 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9864177033 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402535387511 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18973498331 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136175543886 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296097470351 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141536687387 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.