The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the number of US households by their annual income during the years of 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Overall, during three different periods, there was a slight increase in the number of households in the US, except for the figure of $50,000 to $74,999 annual income group, which remained stable. Moreover, the group with an annual income range of $100,000 or more accounted for the most number of US households, whereas the $75,000 to $99,999 annual income group made up the smallest portion.
In 2007, people with an annual income of $100,000 or more constituted nearly 30 million households, more than half of that of the $75,000 to $99,999 income group. The income groups of $25,000 to $49,999 and $50,000 to $74,999 showed a slight gap of under 5% between the number of households in the US.
However, in 2011 and 2015, despite unchanged rankings, all income groups experienced changes in the number of households, except for the $50,000 and $74,999 income group’s data that stabilized at over 20 million households. In 2011, the four annual income groups, excluding the $50,000 and $74,999 group, all experienced a small fluctuation in the number of households before slightly increasing in 2015.
- In many countries children participate in some paid work in their spare time Some people think that this is wrong but others believe that such work will extend children s knowledge and increase their sense of responsibility What is your opinion 73
- Some people say that drug companies have a responsibility to spend money on researching medicines that will help people in poorer countries Others say the main responsibility of drug companies is to make money Discuss both these views and give your own op 89
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 73
- The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries health care is free paid for by the state In other countries payment is divided between the state and people themselves Discuss both systems and say which one is better 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, whereas, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93034825871 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52705956573 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477611940299 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.8442599144 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.571428571 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244787898598 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171907823822 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108855112069 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22260139389 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120903261921 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, whereas, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93034825871 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52705956573 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477611940299 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.8442599144 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.571428571 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244787898598 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171907823822 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108855112069 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22260139389 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120903261921 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.