It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should stop this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?"
The modern era of urbanization has witnessed severe extinction of animal species as their habitats have become continuously hazardous. Some argue that it is a futile endeavor for humans to interfere with this natural process and prevent the extinction of animal species. Despite acknowledging the logic behind this assertion to some extent, I still believe that humans should be held accountable for this issue.
On the one hand, the proponents for non-intervention in wildlife disappearance are sound to some extent. First and foremost, extinction is an inherent part of the evolutionary processes on the Earth maintaining a healthy, thriving, and diverse ecosystem. Certain species, including dinosaurs, faced cataclysmic climate changes that led to their demise, followed by the emergence of other species with possess stronger survival abilities that are supposed to be descendants of the formers. Therefore, attempting to prevent such extinctions, according to this view, interferes with the natural order of the planet, meaning that it can cause more disadvantages rather than offering any practical benefit, Moreover, all efforts spent on conserving endangered species may not guarantee desired outcomes while demanding exorbitant expenses that can be allocated to more pressing issues.
However, I still opine that people should take immediate action to alleviate this issue for reasons related to human impacts and the values that endangered species can offer. Humans, as conscious stewards of the planet, have a moral obligation to mitigate the impacts of their actions and preserve the diversity of life. Indeed, mass deforestation to build infrastructure or for timber harvesting, overhunting, and pollution due to industrial waste have cost wild animals their living habitats, affecting biodiversity and potentially causing a domino effect on other interconnected species. Another significant aspect is that endangered species often possess unique genetic traits which should be studied thoroughly to pave the way for breakthroughs in medicine, biotechnology, and other scientific domains. For instance, a species might have developed resistance to certain diseases, which could inform medical research and contribute to the development of new treatments.
In conclusion, while the natural process of extinction has been a recurring phenomenon throughout Earth's history, I would take the view that people should hinder it to save threatened species. Preventing the extinction of animal species is not only an ethical imperative but also crucial for groundbreaking discoveries that can greatly benefit humanity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should stop this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant
- Some believe that people will purchase a product based on their needs and advertising is not needed To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2252.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86458333333 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20291750683 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614583333333 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8617510022 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.857142857 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18820364067 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678543479506 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523980185324 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129225947445 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525145005313 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.31 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 78.4519038076 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.