Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop

Essay topics:

Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Should government put no restrictions on any scientific research and development? I partly agree with this viewpoint scince there are advantageous progress it brings, but I also maintain that government should restrain some specific researches due to their consequences.

To begin with, putting fewer restrictions on scentific research will benefit the society as a whole, especially in the term of solving social problems. These days, the society is facing many throny problems which are needed to be tackled as soon as possible. Many scentific reseaches and experients are related to this. If these attemptions are restrained by the government, the society is hard to solve the problems and thrive. For instance, at the end of 2019, the world faced the terrible breakout of COVID-19, which caused many people to death. At that time, each country were putting a lot of resources and energy and talents to support the creation of the vaccines. Finally, under the insist hardwork and numberless researches of the scientists and professional experts, they made it. This big achievement saved a great number of people from danger, and enabled the society to work as normal. Imagine if there are any restritions on this field, the great work will be deterred.

Furthermore, less restricitions are conducive to carrying out creative ideas for scientists. Some scientists put forward some wonderful and imaginary ideas, but if the government not allow them to put it into practises, it would disencourage the on a large extent. What's worse, many other researchers are less inclined to think up with the innovative ideas and have a try. It would limit the development of the science. For example, at the first period of the invention of autonomous car, people were doubting about these ideas that cars could drive themselves without human. And the government actrully encouraged this kind of creative thinking, at least it was not resricted. After many years of reseaches of artificial intelligence and the development of the machenic industry, the virtual blueprint had finally come true, and many cities has been putting it into test on the real condition of the road. The support of the government is crucial to this achievement.

However, governments ought to put restrictions on specific researches and development, considering their possible detrimental consequences. We should not allow all aspects of the development. It is true that some researches have a disadvantageous effects to the human beings. For example, we could not say clearly what a gene-editing research and its implementation could bring to the progress of humanbeing, because it might be a catastrophie. Other examples such as the forever pollution of the development of nuclear energy. Thus, we should consider carefully that the standard of supporting a research is that it will benefit humanbeings whether on a short term or a long term, instead of lead us to death.

In conclusion, I contend that the government should put no restrictions on the field that truly benefit the society and humanbeing, and restrict some kinds of development which might lead us to a bad consequence.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-19 Celestina Asantewaa 83 view
2024-10-03 shivamzala17 75 view
2024-06-29 sefeliz 83 view
2024-06-29 sefeliz 83 view
2024-03-02 LauraTing 79 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user LauraTing :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...reation of the vaccines. Finally, under the insist hardwork and numberless researches of t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...uld disencourage the on a large extent. Whats worse, many other researchers are less ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...the invention of autonomous car, people were doubting about these ideas that cars could drive...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 248, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... some researches have a disadvantageous effects to the human beings. For example, we co...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 596, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...refully that the standard of supporting a research is that it will benefit humanbeings whe...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, as for, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, it is true, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2659.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24457593688 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04853515582 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514792899408 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.3687145206 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.269230769 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185589393365 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522743920227 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592470976883 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127190244871 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564128371736 0.0667264976115 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.