Many children nowadays are spending more and more time inside rather than outside. Is this a positive or negative trend? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your knowledge or experience.
Today, it can be seen that kids spend almost all their time inside compared to the outside. Indoor times are preferred by this current generation these days. I opine that this is a sheerly negative development. This essay elucidates the reasons behind my rationale for utilizing appropriate childhood time.
On the one hand, children spend most of their time playing video games, watching television, console games, and many more. Studies say that the sheer inclination towards technical gadgets is a matter of concern. It has major serious ailments like Diabetes and Obesity. Moreover, children always glued to technical objects raises the question of social skills. As is apparent that the high influence of electronic devices on the younger minds is a pressing concern and it needs to be curtailed for their betterment.
On the other hand, although adolescents increase their motor skills, they need to work to grow physically. Playing outside can help them sheer physical workout which makes younger people fitter and healthier. Additionally, if they mingle with other children on the ground, they can imbibe qualities such as socialization and teamwork. Whoever taking care of the offspring can partially avail of the mobile games periodically. This way the growth of balance of mental and physical can be maintained.
To sum up, Although modern electronic devices are the favorite pastime of the younger generation instead of their various fascinating and intriguing applications, spending outdoor time in different activities is far more essential for the holistic development of the child.
- You have decided to leave your current job and look for a new one Write a letter to a friend In your letter explain why you want to leave your current job describe what kind of job you are looking for ask for some help or advice 73
- You recently found out that the local council has decided to demolish a particular building in your area You disagree with this decision and believe that the building is beneficial for the community Write a letter to the local councilor In your letter exp 73
- Overpopulation is the world s most serious environmental problem To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 11
- You recently took a long vacation In your absence a friend did you a huge favor Write a letter thanking your friend In your letter Explain what the favor was Describe how this favor helped you Offer compensation Write at least 150 words You do NOT need to 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whoever” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ies such as socialization and teamwork. Whoever taking care of the offspring can partia...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.428 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80207066292 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.809480042 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167630951878 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501615566001 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472823715017 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100995541282 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503418294287 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whoever” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ies such as socialization and teamwork. Whoever taking care of the offspring can partia...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.428 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80207066292 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.809480042 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167630951878 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501615566001 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472823715017 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100995541282 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503418294287 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.