The table below shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990, 2000 and
2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the man features and make
comparisons where relevant.
The table gives information about how much milk is produced yearly in four nations (Netherland, Australia, Tanzania and Guatemala) in three different period (1990,2000, and 2010). Overall, it is readilly apparent that Netherlands dominated the annual milk production. Furthermore, Three countries experienced a significant increased of the yearly milk production, except for Australia which showed a gradual declined througout the period.
In 1990, as many as 11,262,000 litres milk were produced annually in Netherland and the milk production then fell slightly by about 70,000 litres in the following years before it raised to 11,466,000 litres in the last given period. Australia second in the annual milk production. However, the figure for Autralia saw a significant declined througt the period. In innitial year, Australia produced milk just below that of Netherland (11,246,000), decreasing by 241,000 liters in the following decade and finishing the period at 9,165,000 liters of milk produced yearly.
Although both Tanzania and Guatemala were the least of the annual milk production compared to former nations, they showed a prominent improvement in the number of milk produced. In 1990, the figure for annual milk production in Tanzania was 87,000 liters of milk, meanwhile the figure for Guatemala was just below a third that of Tanzania. Then, in the folowing decades, as many as 142,000 liters of milk was produced in tanzania, while in Guatemala was only below half that of Tanzania. In the final reported years, both Tanzania and Guatema milk productions significantly rose with the improvement in Tanzania was almost two times than the innitial year, meanwhile in Guatemala, the annual milk production rose almost four time than the first given period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-20 | Ha Khanh Linh | view | |
| 2023-03-04 | kieutrangkg1 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Sarbjeet kaur | 58 | view |
- Some commentators feel that grandparents should live together with their children and grandchildren while others say that elderly people should be encouraged to live independently Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You 73
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, then, third, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 965.302439024 155% => OK
No of words: 274.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44525547445 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80977340292 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478102189781 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 283.868780488 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8432999002 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.636363636 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216415657068 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982907998817 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514108559262 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157042725073 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431611048975 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.