The graph below gives information about the price of bananas in four countries between 1994 and 2004.
The graph shows the sales cost of bananas in Japan, France, Germany and the US from 1994 to 2004.
Overall, the cost of buying bananas in Japan, the US, and Germany experienced a slight change whereas it somewhat remained unchanged in France.
In 1994, the price for buying a kilogram of bananas in Japan was recorded at almost 2 dollars, the highest price among all 4 surveyed countries. The price then peaked at an all-time high of almost 3 dollars one year later before fluctuating to reach a record low for the Japanese banana selling price of 1.6 dollars in 2001. From then on, the price steadily rose to 2.5 dollars at the end of the surveyed period.
In France and Germany, the selling cost for bananas was at 1.6 and 1.4 dollars for a kilogram respectively in 1994. Both of them underwent a similar path of slightly decreasing to roughly 1.3 dollars in 2000. Then while the price for bananas in Germany more or less remained the same throughout the rest of the surveyed period, the banana price in France fluctuated significantly before finally reaching the same price as in 1994.
On the other hand, the American banana price rose slightly from 0.9 dollars in 1994 to roughly 1.2 dollars in 1995, then leveling the same price until the year of 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-25 | lethianhthu | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Kayla | 74 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | wwwdung | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | Md Rakib | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The table shows how many international students studies in Canada and the US by the country of origin 67
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog. 73
- The tables compare working hours of full time and part time workers in Greece Netherlands and the UK compared to European average in 2002 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, then, whereas, while, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69955156951 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39965208924 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493273542601 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7606026127 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217224817693 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10688184913 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067822944368 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142001192792 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559048172792 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.