Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development, while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The growth in globalization is believed by some that have boosted economic development and better cross-cultural understanding on a global scale. However, some people argue that such development is the biggest culprit behind the degradation of cultural identity in many countries. Although both sides have rational reasons which will be elaborated on in this essay, personally, I believe it is a positive trend.
On the one hand, some people are afraid that globalization will pose a threat to the cultural quintessence of each nation. Indeed, the dominance of affluent countries’ cultures speeds up the disappearance of others’ cultural heritages. For instance, being exposed to international social media and friends, the Vietnamese young generation prefers American and Korean songs, films, and TV shows rather than their traditional ones due to the process of integration. As a consequence, occident costumes, foods, and lifestyles have gradually penetrated Vietnamese people’s daily lives, taking the place of time-honored values. In addition, to facilitate commercial activities with prosperous countries, such as America, China, Korea, and Japan, it is required to know their languages or at least be fluent in English, leading to the problem that other minor dialects would gradually be on the verge of extinction.
However, I agree with the opinion that the expansion of global business and cultural relations is a largely helpful development. First and foremost, both guest and host countries have experienced a surge in employment opportunities and unparalleled economic gains under globalization. Businesses can reap the benefits from a drop in trade barriers such as penetrating potential overseas markets and taking advantage of incentives for foreign investment of host countries to upscale their business. Meanwhile, competent employees can have chances to work in multinational corporations, benefiting from favorable compensation and great opportunities to develop career paths. Furthermore, globalization has also encouraged the tourism industry, thereby, promoting a better understanding of other cultures. Experiencing different ways of life, discovering new food and customs and visiting cultural sites will eventually help people broaden their knowledge, respect other cultures, and integrate positive values into their belief system.
In conclusion, while this matter can be associated with both advantageous and disadvantageous, I am more inclined to believe in its positivity. Nevertheless, it is important to strike a balance, so that nations can reap rewards from international trade and cultural exchange without sacrificing their own identity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-31 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-02 | uyenmia | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-02 | uyenmia | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | tnhu9400 | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-30 | driverhiepkhachvnteam | 73 | view |
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people Do you agree or disagree 78
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, at least, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2297.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88974358974 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30182445133 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628205128205 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8424470299 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.5625 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254780324765 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778726944932 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493464748555 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142253236339 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388602764049 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 78.4519038076 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.