The charts below give information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts demonstrate the information of waste disposal in different types of waste such as paper, textiles, glass and so on in one country in 1960 and 2011.
Overall, while the percentages in paper took the highest point in 1960, this was replaced into the figures of food in the next 50 years. Units in the essay are measured in percentages.
Regarding to the figures of paper experienced a decrease from a fourth to 15 in 2011. Likewise, the disposal of food was a half of the percentages of paper in 1960 (12), it grew up significantly to 21 in 2011. The proportions of plastic stayed at the minor point in 1960 with 8, it rose to 18, becoming the third highest waste disposal in 2011. The percentages of wood were a minor point in 1960 which was 4, before doubling into 8 over a half of century.
In contrast, the figures of glass, metal and green waste were remained unchanged in over 50 years, which were 5, 9 and 9, respectively. Finally, the amount of waste disposal in other factors underwent a drop into 4 in 2011, which was three times lower than its was in 1960.
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, likewise, regarding, so, third, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43718592965 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62767466106 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532663316583 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2597482635 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1111111111 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20525049216 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881771992848 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110266783972 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151353790343 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137539039584 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.