Some people give more importance to artists (painters, writers, musicians) in the current age of rapidly developing technology and science. What do you think? Do people prefer arts to technology in your views?
In the modern era, there are numerous technological cutting-edge devices that improve our life. But some people argued that it is vital for artists to perform their shows rather than the influence of scientific and technological advance. In my opinion, although the power of technology makes people life more advance and convenient, arts are something that hold a special place in our heart.
On the other hand, it is admitted that technology give birth to many new form of art. With high-tech devices, art and gallery in three dimensional space, digital art and streaming music are even more possible than ever. Therefore, people can enjoy the art in these way. Moreover, technology also bring artists closer to their audiences. Digital platforms allow them to share their creations to their fans, which encourage artists to show their talent to more people.
However, art give us an opportunity to see things from different perspective. In the world of science and technology, people can only see things as the way they are. However, art use imagination and creativity to see things as the way they want. For instance, in science, a cat can only be seen as a soft fur and four leg creature. But in artist’s eyes cat is a friend, a hero or even a culture symbol. Art help us gain deeper insight into the world we live. Learning how to see and thing from different perspective also help us in solving problems.
To conclude, technology have a huge impact on human development. However, the cultural and mental values from art cannot be overweighed. The best solution to this problem is to find a way for art and technology to co-exist and enhance one another
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-24 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-24 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | phạm khánh linh | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | phạm khánh linh | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | phạm khánh linh | 92 | view |
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
- The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015
- More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development You should write at least 250 words You should use your own idea knowledge and ex 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this way' or 'these ways'?
Suggestion: this way; these ways
... Therefore, people can enjoy the art in these way. Moreover, technology also bring artist...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85915492958 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70403278364 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588028169014 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3406977288 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.6666666667 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219729168991 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687647578295 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462355584686 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135761966081 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532680681911 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.