The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
The given bar chart depicts the results of an investigation of people’s coffee and tea purchasing and drinking habits over last 4 weeks in five different Australian cities.
Overall, most of Australian in five cities went to coffee or tea shop to drink directly in last 4 weeks, while fresh coffee was less chosen by individuals compared to instant coffee which was more prevalent to the citizen in city dwellers in Australia.
Regarding the percentage of city residents serving coffee or tea directly at shop in last 4 weeks, Melbourne and Hobart shared the same percentage of city residents going to a café for coffee or tea, at 64%, which was the highest among other demographics, followed by Sydney with 61% of citizens drinking coffee or tea directly at the coffee or tea shop. For Brisbane and Adelaide, going to café for coffee or tea was less popular in those two cities with respective figures being 55% and 49%
Concerning buying instant coffee, it was the prevalent trend for Australian city dwellers in five urban areas over last 4 weeks with 54% for Hobart, 53% for Brisbane and 50% for Adelaide, both Sydney and Melbourne were recorded under 50% with the figures being recorded at 45% and 47% correspondingly. Turning to purchasing fresh in the last 4 weeks, the proportion of people residing in Brisbane buying fresh coffee was identical to Adelaide, at 34% and the total proportion of city dwellers buying fresh coffee in Sydney and Melbourne was 86% (44% for Sydney and 42% for Melbourne) which was almost double the figure of Hobart.
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began 73
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows the number of temporary migrant worker in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 Summarise the information by selecti 67
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2011 and 2021 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, well, while
/var/www/anaconda2/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vaderSentiment/vaderSentiment.py:242: UnicodeWarning: Unicode equal comparison failed to convert both arguments to Unicode - interpreting them as being unequal
if chr in self.emojis:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89056603774 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63736602261 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445283018868 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 53.0 22.4926829268 236% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.850646668 43.030603864 211% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 259.2 112.824112599 230% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 53.0 22.9334400587 231% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282350830495 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196301266892 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093622426854 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2217989781 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876871982427 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.1 13.2329268293 212% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.6 10.3012195122 210% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.97 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 23.2 10.9970731707 211% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, well, while
/var/www/anaconda2/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vaderSentiment/vaderSentiment.py:242: UnicodeWarning: Unicode equal comparison failed to convert both arguments to Unicode - interpreting them as being unequal
if chr in self.emojis:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89056603774 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63736602261 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445283018868 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 53.0 22.4926829268 236% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.850646668 43.030603864 211% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 259.2 112.824112599 230% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 53.0 22.9334400587 231% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282350830495 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196301266892 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093622426854 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2217989781 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876871982427 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.1 13.2329268293 212% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.6 10.3012195122 210% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.97 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 23.2 10.9970731707 211% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.