Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications. How it is effecting the way of lives of individual and society?
An increasing trend in today's world is the emergence of argument about the effects of mass communication on the lives of individual. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of above statement, concerned with the notion that information revolution has changed the way of mass communications, using a practical approach.
At the outset, there are several benefits in favor of my stance, the most significant one includes the betterment of society and growth of every individual on the planet. Thanks to the benefits offered one can not only attain greater success and effectiveness, but can also enhance his efficiency, productivity and quality of life with greater ease. Other factors impacted by the statement are awareness about information technology, robotics, and machine learning.
Many other factors like communication all over the world, removal of language constraints, and advancement in technology can also be taken into account. Furthermore, mass communication has brought people closer to each other, and in this way they are close enough to participate in sorrows and happiness with greater ease. Moreover, society will also has positive impact if people residing in it are happy. That is the reason why many are in the favor of above notion related to information revolution.
To conclude, from my perspective, the government of Australia is taking great initiative in educating its citizens against the negative impacts of the statement. People are encouraged to adhere to applicable laws and regulations related to information revolution and the ways of mass communications that will surely bring prosperity, productivity, efficiency and development of country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-20 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
- Nowadays the problem of animal extinction reaches great attention That is why animal conservations have been created in order to save endangered animals Nevertheless animal conservations are not only the places for animals but also hunters Many hunte 77
- Why do you think people go to the university 77
- education is more important or working friendly with other is more important in hiring new staff explain your opinion with examples 80
- Agree or disagree with getting married before school education and job secured 55
- copyright is more common now write some solutions to prevent piracy 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55598455598 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19777374446 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598455598456 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3693302774 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.818181818 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 7.25397266985 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293143790857 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925714826021 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824709631348 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17075582474 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940165262329 0.0609392437508 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.