The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries: China and India. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given images illustrate the amount of food consumed by individuals all around the world, compared with two Asian countries which are China and India in 2008. Overall, all three pie charts show that processed food was the most kind of food that was used by individuals. Another noticeable point is that while in the world and in India, animal food played an important role in their eating plans, the rate of it in China was the lowest in 4 examined types of food.
Regarding the information on processed food, the consumption of people in the world, China and India, was always highest, accounting for 41%, 34% and 39% respectively. Besides that, the usage for nuts and seeds was the tiniest rate in three examined areas, 11% for India, which was dramatically lower than that of China, at 19%, but it is still nearly three times higher than the other one in the world, standing at 4%.
Turning into vegetables and fruits, China was the country that had the highest consumption in three regions, at 32%. By contrast, just 29% of the total consumption was for vegetables and foods in the world, and 23% was for that in India. Moreover, the percentage of animal food in the world and India was similar to each other, at 26% and 27% respectively, which was double that rate in China, making up 15% for that kind of food.
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 89
- Research shows that some activities are good for health and others are bad Despite knowing that millions of people engage in unhealthy activities What is the cause of this What can be done 56
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, moreover, regarding, still, while, as for, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65106382979 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44947495783 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.2320406349 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.625 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.375 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245384325258 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132872600053 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527022094224 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182917545371 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589906557473 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.