The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013.The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013.The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013.
The given bar chart details information about the frequency of fast-food consumption by the American from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, most people tend to eat junk food once a week but afterward their preference had clearly altered and got into the habit of eating fast food once or twice a month. Additionally, the proportion of people who never consumed fast food declined throughout the period.
The figure for those eating junk food once a week began at roughly 31% in the first year, rose steadily by 4% in 2006 and finally ended at about 27% in 2013. Similarly, the proportion of America citizens eating instant refreshments once or twice a week was at 30% in 2003, decreased and then rebounded to about 34% by 2013.
Approximately 17% of American ate junk food several times a weekend in 2003 rose to 20% in the next three years before falling back to about 16% in 2013. The percentage of people in the USA who consumed fast food every day and never was nearly identical in these three years with the former at 4% in 2003 and then 3% and the latter starting at 5% and reaching 4% in the final year. Looking at the figure for individuals consuming fast food a few times a year with the starting point at 12%, which then it showed an increasing trend and reached 15% in 2013.
- The charts below give information on the location and types of dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market 73
- The picture illustrates the disparity of a park named Grange Park between 1920 and today 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun rose seems to be countable, so consider using: '2003 rises', '2003 roses'.
Suggestion: 2003 rises; 2003 roses
...te junk food several times a weekend in 2003 rose to 20% in the next three years before f...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, look, similarly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54545454545 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4651009513 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541125541126 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.8170263283 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.25 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279275873007 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143352712222 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12181842236 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211301552075 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14453454045 0.0819641961636 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.