The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000.
The bar chart compares the number of passenger kilometers travelled by five distinct modes of transportation in the UK spanning 10 years from 1990 to 2000. Units are measured in billions.
Overall, bus and rail were by far the most popular means of transport, as opposed to others. Another interesting highlight is that both bicycle and motorbike travel underwent a downturn whilst the trend was reversed for the rest of surveyed categories (including total).
In 1990, buses topped the list at around 45 billion, followed by the second place of rail (40 billion). Moreover, aviation travel was far lagging behind with only 5 billion in the same year. 10 years later, the passenger kilometres covered by bus, rail and air travel all gradually climbed to less than 50 billion for the first two modes and just under 10 billion for the last one. Following similar patterns, total kilometres travelled also showed a rise of approximately 10 billion in the same year.
On the other hand, fewer kilometres were travelled by bicycle and motorbike during the same time frame with the former seeing a negligible drop from 2.5 billion in 1990 to 2 billion in 2000 and the latter witnessing a change from 3 billion in 1990 down to a bit less than the original number in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
- Task 1 The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 67
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 73
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie chart shows percentage of people working in different sectors between Town A and Town B in 2 different years in 1960 and 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o 2000. Units are measured in billions. Overall, bus and rail were by far the m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of surveyed categories including total. In 1990, buses topped the list at around...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oximately 10 billion in the same year. On the other hand, fewer kilometres wer...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86175115207 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60191204155 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603686635945 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4843562759 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.222222222 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258373258829 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101034362279 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101053814488 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166429626248 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094351077427 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.