average yearly spending by Americans on mobile and landline phone services
The line graph compares average yearly spending by Americans on mobile and landline phone services from 2001 to 2010.
It is clear that spending on landline phones fell steadily over the 10-year period, while mobile phone expenditure rose quickly. The year 2006 marks the point at which expenditure on mobile services overtook that for residential phone services.
In 2001, US consumers spent an average of nearly $700 on residential phone services, compared to only around $200 on cell phone services. Over the following five years, average yearly spending on landlines dropped by nearly $200. By contrast, expenditure on mobiles rose by approximately $300.
In the year 2006, the average American paid out the same amount of money on both types of phone service, spending just over $500 on each. By 2010, expenditure on mobile phones had reached around $750, while the figure for spending on residential services had fallen to just over half this amount.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-11 | HATHUYBINH | 67 | view |
2022-03-26 | Lia Nguyen | view | |
2020-06-12 | karanbirsinghrandhawa | 56 | view |
2019-12-22 | Spring2019 | 84 | view |
2019-05-29 | ludovicag | 70 | view |
- THIRD CULTURE KIDS (-Syerapke-) 80
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009 70
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in millions of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories from 1995 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant REWRITE 93
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market. 86
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think are consumers influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them? 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 155 200
No. of Characters: 776 1000
No. of Different Words: 86 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.528 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.006 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.518 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 12 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.476 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.48 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.717 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.144 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4